Aka: How do I come up with my Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and/or qualitative research question?
Updated February 2022
I am frequently asked for advice on how to come up with a suitable research question (RQ) for a qualitative study, and more specifically, an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). As a frequently posed question, I thought some (hopefully) helpful guidance might assist you.
Truth bomb: your research question may change as you conduct your research
One point that is important to make here is that while RQs are important as they guide the design and the execution of a qualitative research study, they do tend to evolve, and may change or be updated as you progress through your research. They could therefore be described as provisional.
With this in mind, try not to get too hung up on producing the perfect RQ for your IPA study, and be mindful to hold it lightly as it could alter (or even transform!) before you get to the end of the research process (mine certainly did for my professional doctorate).
How to start formulating your IPA research question
Firstly, it’s a no-brainer, but worth mentioning that your topic area and RQ are obviously going to be intimately connected, with the topic area being much broader than the RQ you develop.
My first suggestion in the process of developing your RQ is therefore to start broad and map out your topic area to the best of your ability. See your free IPA Study Survival Guide with its Road Map and Checklist for handy tips and guidance on how to go about this process.
Once you have an idea of the ‘terrain’ of your topic area and have mapped out what has already been done, what we already know in the field in question, and where any gaps may be, you can start to narrow down. Your goal is to develop some broader aims and objectives for your research project (i.e., what are you looking to achieve with this research study?) From these, you will be able to pin down your RQ itself.
Narrowing down to develop your IPA research question
Asking yourself the following series of questions may help with this:
What do you want to know?
Purpose: to identify your point of interest. For example, women and coaching practices.
Start to narrow down or curtail the scope:
Which/what features are you interested in knowing about?
E.g., are you interested in the process of coaching women or what it feels like/the experience of being coached or doing the coaching? The language used in the process of coaching?
TIP: look at the extant literature from your mapping exercise.What is already out there and what has already been done? Where are the gaps? This will inform your approach/aims and objectives and therefore RQ. Check the suggestions for further research in the papers you have reviewed. You are looking to build upon, extend, add to, or challenge what has already been done.
Narrow down further:
What do you want to be able to say at the end of your research? Do you want to be able to say something about a single group or phenomenon? Do you want to identify a process in a dyad or another small group such as a family/team? Do you want to identify and/or understand the features of different experiences?
Returning to our coaching example, perhaps you want to say something about the experience of different coaching approaches or contexts (e.g., career coaching or other coaching)? Understanding more about this will help you outline your aims and objectives and from these, pin down your RQ.
What do you want to do with the findings? For example, do you want to inform policy, create a model, generate a theory, develop a tool, or simply provide a rich and thick description of something as a starting point if the topic area has little previous investigation? You may want to continue beyond this particular study to start building a corpus of research, in which case, this study may be the first step or building block in that endeavour. What do your stakeholders require? For example, they may want larger-scale findings to support some element of transferability of the knowledge created.
How are RQs employing your methodology usually posed? What is the language and tone that is typically utilised? Scour the extant literature for examples from relevant research that employs your chosen methodology to guide you.
TIP: qualitative RQs are exploratory in nature and in IPA they tend to focus on the meaning of experiences/phenomena and how people make meaning of those experiences/phenomena. Thus, qualitative RQs tend to ask HOW (and/or WHAT) rather than WHY and you are likely to find that the term ‘experience’ may well show up in your IPA RQ!
It can be a struggle to come up with your RQ (it most definitely was for me!) However, don’t give up, and remember that research is basically a series of compromises – there is no such thing as the perfect RQ or perfect research project!
If you work down from your map of the topic area to the broader aims and objectives of your research study, your RQ should emerge from that process.
However, remember to consider feasibility:
Be aware that you are likely to be overambitious at the beginning: usually, students come with too big of a question that could be more than one study or even a PhD. They often have to scale back for the purposes of their project and choose what is really interesting to them and feasible/do-able.
If you suspect that your RQ is too big, ask yourself what you could do now that you are most excited about, and that could provide a stepping stone for the next move forward in answering your big question.
Summary of top tips for coming up with a research question
- Read relevant research in the topic area and check suggestions for further research and how the study’s aims, objectives and RQs have been posed
- Start broad and narrow down using the questions ideas and suggestions in this article
- If you have come up with too big of a question, consult with your supervisor and/or peers to break it down into smaller, more manageable, and do-able project ideas and RQs
- Remember that your RQ (and therefore study itself) does need to ignite and excite you if it is to sustain your interest over what could be quite a lengthy research journey
Recommended literature to read around developing your qualitative and/or IPA RQ:
NOTE: While this is an undergraduate text, this chapter is freely available on the internet and is a very well-constructed introduction to writing qualitative RQs – just Google Scholar it
Larkin, M. (2015). Choosing your approach. In J.A. Smith (Ed.) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 249-256). London: Sage
Smith, J.A., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2009). Planning an IPA research study. In J.A. Smith, M. Larkin, & P. Flowers, Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (pp.40-55). London: Sage
And of course, in the 2022 Second Edition, head immediately to pages 41 to 43 in Chapter Three ‘Planning an IPA Research Study’
Willig, C. (2013). Qualitative research design and data collection. In C. Willig, Introducing qualitative research in psychology, (pp. 23-38). Berks, UK: OU Press
Recommended journal article:
NOTE: relevant journal articles were quite thin on the ground (interesting, huh?), but this one is of good quality and presents useful examples, although more from social sciences disciplines than specifically psychology. Plus it is open access from Google Scholar – bonus!
Finishing up – please do reach out!
This topic for this article was bought to you at the request of a mailing list member who is approaching this step of their research journey.
I would love to be as responsive as I can to your real-time research dilemmas, so please do join the mailing list and reply to your welcome email or use the contact form to send me a message to let me know of any specific areas you would like me to cover, and I will do my best to help out!
Until next time!
To your research success, Elena
Copyright © 2020-24 Dr Elena Gil-Rodriguez
These works are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. Dr Elena GR grants to you a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, revocable licence to view these works, to copy and store these works and to print pages of these works for your own personal and non-commercial use. You may not reproduce in any format any part of the works without my prior written consent. Distributing this material in any form without permission violates my rights – please respect them.
The information contained in this article or any other content on this website is provided for information and guidance purposes only and is based on Dr Elena GR’s experience in teaching, conducting, and supervising IPA research projects.
All such content is intended for information and guidance purposes only and is not meant to replace or supersede your supervisory advice/guidance or institutional and programme requirements, and are not intended to be the sole source of information or guidance upon which you rely for your research study.
You must obtain supervisory and institutional advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of my guidance and/or content and materials.
Dr Gil-Rodriguez disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed upon any of the contents of my website or associated content/materials.
Finally, please note that the use of my content/materials does not guarantee any particular grade for your work.